A time capsule view of left revival
Feb. 18th, 2019 11:31 amI liked Socialism: Past and Future so I figured I'd read some earlier Harrington. Selections at the BPL are limited, so I ended up reading Toward a Democratic Left, written in 1968. 1968 was around the time all the hopeful energy of the earlier '60s protest movements was souring into the weirdo hellscape that was the '70s, and Toward a Democratic Left represents an attempt to turn that sour turn around and channel it into something constructive. As with much of the Harrington I've read, there are certainly criticisms one can make, but it's hard to argue that wouldn't be much better off as a society if we'd collectively decided to take his suggestions instead of the Reaganites that we went with.
A lot of the content is hugely dated, making the work an interesting time capsule if you're interested in the state of the 1960s urban housing crisis and how it differs from today's urban housing crisis. It's easy enough to see how the roots of many of our current political problems have roots in the failures to solve the last round of political problems, and in such detrimental developments as the rise of what Harrington calls the social-industrial complex, which is basically when big businesses decide they're going to fix all the social problems now because they're smart and successful, and we're all supposed to ignore that they're also the ones who got us into many of our current messes. It'd be interesting to do a side-by-side comparison of Harrington's predictions about the social-industrial complex and Anand Giridharadas' documentation of how it actually panned out, but I will have to give Toward a Democratic Left back to the library before Winners Take All comes in (there are like, 50 people ahead of me in the queue).
Notably, Harrington did not predict the fall of the Soviet Union or the end of the Cold War, but he did predict that the main axis of world geopolitical conflict would pivot away from East vs West and mainly be about North versus South, with rich countries fucking up poor postcolonial countries in the name of aid and development. And lo, that trend did indeed continue.
I do not get the sense from reading this that Harrington's predictions are genius works of fortune-telling, nor that they are particularly unique to Harrington. If you have a generally left worldview and do your homework, it is rarely shocking to conclude that the rich are behaving self-interestedly, and letting them throw their weight around is unlikely to do a whole lot to help anyone besides other rich people. Still, I think it's helpful to know that some of our current political woes are not surprises.