A few lovely things
Dec. 14th, 2011 06:41 pmHello, nerds and nerdettes!
If you are anything like me, you enjoy poking around on the Internet reading random things in the hopes that you will find things that will make you laugh, cry, or start rooting around in the depths of your bedroom trying to find that old book on Egyptian hieroglyphs that you got halfway through in high school. (Sadly for me, I am pretty sure it is in my other bedroom. But not my other other bedroom, at least.)
Anyway, while I was proofing a Brit Lit project at work, I ran an excerpt from G. K. Chesterton's All Things Considered; specifically the excerpt The Fallacy of Success. It is a beautiful takedown of cheesy self-help "success" books. While it was written many decades ago, I found it still quite relevant, as cheesy self-help success books are, sadly, still alive and well as a genre. You can read it at Project Gutenberg, here: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11505/11505-h/11505-h.htm#THE_FALLACY_OF_SUCCESS
If you know me at all, or have been reading this blog much at all, you will know that there is one genre I have even less respect for than self-help success books, and that is the "genre" of "literary fiction," or at least the concept that "literary fiction" gets to be its own "genre" now, while pretending not to be. It appears I am not the only person to find this stupid! Caitlin Flanagan recently linked to an Atlantic article from about ten years ago on precisely this subject, which explains in hilariously excruciating detail why I will never, ever read a Cormac McCarthy novel. You can read it here: A Reader's Manifesto
And, as for things that make me go rummaging about my room looking for textbooks on dead languages, David Peterson has written a touching (for word nerds) meditation on the growth and current status of language creation: On Conlanging. I could possibly barely qualify at the edges of "being" a conlanger--in high school, I did try my hand at language creation as part of a group project with the particular bunch of odd people I was hanging out with at that point. Unfortunately, all my notes on it have since disappeared. I also spent a fair amount of time attempting to speak both varieties of Elvish (I preferred Sindarin, which was unfortunate, as Quenya was better developed and had much more extensive study resources available). However, that was back when I had the sort of spare time that could support my having hobbies that required thought and effort. (In addition to studying French, Spanish, and German in high school, I learned a decent amount of Sindarin, an almost-working knowledge of Ancient Egyptian, and amassed large stacks of textbooks on various other languages, although never did much with them. In college I had to translate poetry out of Anglo-Saxon but never learned enough that I didn't have to have a grammar and a dictionary with me, but it was fun anyway.) At any rate, I do still adore linguistics and kind of regret not having had the opportunity to do a second major in it, but that's what I get for going to a small school.
If you are anything like me, you enjoy poking around on the Internet reading random things in the hopes that you will find things that will make you laugh, cry, or start rooting around in the depths of your bedroom trying to find that old book on Egyptian hieroglyphs that you got halfway through in high school. (Sadly for me, I am pretty sure it is in my other bedroom. But not my other other bedroom, at least.)
Anyway, while I was proofing a Brit Lit project at work, I ran an excerpt from G. K. Chesterton's All Things Considered; specifically the excerpt The Fallacy of Success. It is a beautiful takedown of cheesy self-help "success" books. While it was written many decades ago, I found it still quite relevant, as cheesy self-help success books are, sadly, still alive and well as a genre. You can read it at Project Gutenberg, here: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/11505/11505-h/11505-h.htm#THE_FALLACY_OF_SUCCESS
If you know me at all, or have been reading this blog much at all, you will know that there is one genre I have even less respect for than self-help success books, and that is the "genre" of "literary fiction," or at least the concept that "literary fiction" gets to be its own "genre" now, while pretending not to be. It appears I am not the only person to find this stupid! Caitlin Flanagan recently linked to an Atlantic article from about ten years ago on precisely this subject, which explains in hilariously excruciating detail why I will never, ever read a Cormac McCarthy novel. You can read it here: A Reader's Manifesto
And, as for things that make me go rummaging about my room looking for textbooks on dead languages, David Peterson has written a touching (for word nerds) meditation on the growth and current status of language creation: On Conlanging. I could possibly barely qualify at the edges of "being" a conlanger--in high school, I did try my hand at language creation as part of a group project with the particular bunch of odd people I was hanging out with at that point. Unfortunately, all my notes on it have since disappeared. I also spent a fair amount of time attempting to speak both varieties of Elvish (I preferred Sindarin, which was unfortunate, as Quenya was better developed and had much more extensive study resources available). However, that was back when I had the sort of spare time that could support my having hobbies that required thought and effort. (In addition to studying French, Spanish, and German in high school, I learned a decent amount of Sindarin, an almost-working knowledge of Ancient Egyptian, and amassed large stacks of textbooks on various other languages, although never did much with them. In college I had to translate poetry out of Anglo-Saxon but never learned enough that I didn't have to have a grammar and a dictionary with me, but it was fun anyway.) At any rate, I do still adore linguistics and kind of regret not having had the opportunity to do a second major in it, but that's what I get for going to a small school.