bloodygranuaile: (Default)
 Covering gambling news on the day-to-day, I sometimes feel like the industry doesn't change nearly fast enough. It's been almost seven years since Black Friday, and only three U.S. states — Nevada, New Jersey and Delaware — offer regulated online poker. (Soon to be four, thanks to Pennsylvania, but not soon enough.) Some states, like California, seem to bang their head against the same wall every year and get nowhere. And of course, we're all biting our nails waiting to see what the Supreme Court decides about PASPA, and when they'll get around to deciding if legalized sports betting could actually become reality in the U.S.

But, despite all of the above, it's actually quite a rapidly changing industry. It's worth it, every now and again, to look back at how we got where we are and appreciate just how much batty stuff has happened over the course of gambling's establishment as a legitimate entertainment industry.

Enter David Clary's Gangsters to Governors: The New Bosses of Gambling in America, which was published in October from Rutgers University Press. Clocking in at about 250 pages (plus a lot of notes), this new history of American gambling focuses first on how gaming fell under the control of crime syndicates, and then on how the state drove those elements out, turning control of the industry over to "clean" private corporations, Indian nations and the states themselves. Clary also provides a nuanced, even-handed analysis of the pros and cons of states' use of gaming revenues to balance their budgets.

***

I
 posted a book review over at the day job
bloodygranuaile: (oh noes)
I started reading Elizabeth Bear's One-Eyed Jack: A Novel of the Promethean Age a little over a year ago, in the bathtub at Mohegan Sun.

It has taken me so long to finish the book not because it wasn't good, but because I have only read it in the bath — sometimes at casinos but also sometimes not, otherwise it would have taken me even longer, especially considering the last casino I stayed at only had a shower. My copy is now very water damaged.

Anyway. I had picked One-Eyed Jack for my casino bath reading because it's about the spirit of Las Vegas fighting to keep his city from being annexed by the spirit of Los Angeles, so it seemed topical.

There are actually two spirits (or genii) of Las Vegas: the One-Eyed Jack, who has one normal eye and one magical eye he keeps hidden under an eyepatch; and the Suicide King, otherwise known as Stewart, who seems to have a magical ability to kill himself and then resurrect again. Jackie and Stewart are boyfriends in addition to sharing the job of genius of Las Vegas. This seems like it would break a lot of workplace regulations but it looks like being a magical symbol isn’t a very well-regulated field considering all the other stuff that goes down in this book.

Jackie and Stewart eventually form a coalition with several interesting characters, including two ghosts of different John Henrys, some "media ghosts" of unnamed TV spies, and vampire Elvis (though this vampire Elvis is very different from the vampire Elvis of the Sookie Stackhouse books). The antagonists include Angel (the genius of Los Angeles, in the form of a young ingénue), a character known only as “the assassin,” a Promethean Mage, and the ghost of Bugsy Siegel.

I was a bit confused about who precisely all these people were, since I am not much up on my ‘60s TV spies — nor on my Las Vegas history, really, although I do at least know who Bugsy Siegel is. But once I got used to identifying the spies by their descriptors instead of names, it was all easy enough to follow.

The book takes place mostly in 2002, and as is usually the case, I still find it a bit jarring to realize how long ago the mid-2000s were and how much it really was a different era — it makes me feel old — but it’s impossible to miss because stuff in Vegas changes so fast that, even without ever having been there, I know a bunch of the properties mentioned in the book have since shut down and new ones opened; also, Jackie wears black leather cargo pants because he is terribly cool, and it’s become hard to remember that there was a time when cargo pants really were cool and not just a shorthand for sartorial laziness. Other bits of the book take place in 1964, because that’s when all the media ghosts come from. The time travel isn’t flashy; it just sort of happens—there’s enough ghosts in the story already that visiting the ghost of 1964 isn’t that big a deal.

Since this is a spy story I don’t want to talk too much about the plot but suffice to say that, in keeping with the general theme, it, like a game of poker, features long stretches of quietly waiting and thinking about things (I don’t believe poker is ever boring) interspersed with moments of high drama that vastly change the dynamics at the table. (Poor Angel spends the first three-quarters of the book chipping up relentlessly only to spew off her entire stack in one dumb play. Been there done that; it’s awful.) All the disparate threads and meticulously solved riddles finally come together near the end to put a fast-paced and deceptively simple end to the conspiracy.

One of the unifying principles of how magic works in this book is that it relies very heavily on symbolism and stories and beliefs, reminding me a lot of Discworld if the Discworld books were about twelve thousand percent more serious. Genre savviness is important for our heroes to figure out what is going on. Gaming-related symbolism abounds, which is fitting, because gaming-related symbolism abounds in English writing anyway, only this time it’s all looked at a lot more closely than usual.

Like the other Elizabeth Bear books I’ve read, this was pretty weird and I think I’d have to read it again to figure out some of the weird stuff I didn’t get the first time around, but I’m probably not going to because I have at least three unread Elizabeth Bear books on my shelf at the moment. I always like her stuff but it tends to end up taking me a lot longer to get through than I think it’s going to.

I recommend it to anyone who likes metafictional genre-savvy stuff. Pairs well with a Lush bath bomb, a nice hotel room, and an adult beverage.
bloodygranuaile: (oh noes)
So it turns out that just because I don't work at a Big Six publishing company, it doesn't mean I can't steal any good books from work.

When my old editor-in-chief left, he found an ARC while cleaning out his desk that someone had given us as a review copy back when it was first published. The book was Hit Me!: Fighting the Las Vegas Mob by the Numbers by Danielle Gomes and Jay Benincasa. The ARC is dated May 2013, making this review three years late, so I don't know if I'm supposed to still send the publisher two copies like they asked for. What's the usual practice for this sort of thing? Anyway, publishers, if you wanna send review copies of gambling-related books to Casino City, we'll be more timely in the future, because I'm here now.

Hit Me! follows the story of Dennis Gomes, a young accountant with an unshakable sense of justice who is tasked with heading up and reforming the Nevada Gaming Control Board's Audit Division in 1970's Las Vegas. Most of the casinos in Vegas at this time were owned by Mafia groups--usually multiple outfits, as joint ventures--who massively underreported revenues and used the skimmed funds to finance all sorts of other mob operations back in their home territories. A pretty huge proportion of Nevada's political and law enforcement apparatus was also involved, either actively in the mobs' pockets or just unwilling to cross them. This lack of institutional support--plus the occasional active betrayal from inside the house--makes Gomes's job very, very difficult at times.

While the word "audit" may conjure up for some readers a rather unsexy image of some desk workers poring over spreadsheets, rest assured that this is a full-on gangster story, with all the clandestine meetings, undercover surveillance and raiding rooms full of money at gunpoint that that implies. The cast of characters is also pretty loud, on the cop side as well as the mobster side. Fans of the movie Casino will be able to spot some familiar material in the second half of the book as Gomes starts going after the Stardust's Frank Rosenthal and Tony "the Ant" Spilotro. (The first half of the book I'm not sure about 'cause I didn't see Casino until this Friday, because I am the worst gangster movie fan ever.)

The biggest strength of this book is that it is very, very detailed--not in a lengthy way, but entire conversations are reconstructed verbatim, accompanied by vivid sights and sounds and smells until you feel you might as well be reading a trashy noir novel. Some of this is because the Audit Division kept extraordinarily detailed notes, and some is apparently because Gomes had an excellent memory, but I'm sure a bunch of it is just because some of this shit is so crazy you could never forget it. Gomes makes a relatable enough viewpoint character most of the time; mostly he comes off as very committed to driving the mob out of Vegas and very frustrated when he can't, which is pretty hard to take issue with. You get a glimpse of a little more of a weird dude right at the beginning and right at the end, but for the bulk of the book he's all Secret Agent Man all the time.

I don't know if this is something they may have included in the final printing, but my biggest complaint about this ARC was its lack of photographs. I want some pictures! Mugshots, crime scenes, awful '70s fashion, pics of the tacky old casinos that were there before the tacky current ones. I mean, this should be obvious. The ARC doesn't even identify whose photos are being used on the cover.

Overall, though, this is a high-adrenaline true crime tale, and I especially recommend reading it while drinking wine in the bathtub.
bloodygranuaile: (oh noes)
A few weeks ago I wrote a piece for President's Day at work about Presidential betting (you can read it here) and I referenced Stephen Longstreet's Win or Lose: A Social History of Gambling in America, which had been quoted in another source. This, however, is not the best research practice ever, and also the tidbit quoted was interesting (it was about T.Jeff), so I checked out Win or Lose from the Boston Public Library.
This book, I found out, was published in 1977, which is almost forty years ago now. So it covers a period of time from the mid-1500s up through "the present," except "the present" is the late '70s, and things in the late '70s were very different from how they are now, and it's kind of hilarious to read, at least if you are as easily entertained by historical change as I am. I think I now need a book more thoroughly covering the time from the 1970s to the present, but Win or Lose does a reasonably thorough job of getting the lay reader up to speed with the first 400 years after Columbus' men rolled up on shore after pitching their cards overboard in a fit of piety.
The book can be a bit disjointed, progressing in more or less chronological order except when it is progressing by subject, where the subject can be either a type of gambling or a specific location or something else. The bulk of each chapter is mostly stories about individual gamblers who were very important or interesting within the given context; they're usually pretty entertaining stories even if they do seem to jump around with little in the way of transitions. But there's also time devoted to explaining how different gambling scenes worked overall, and the rises and falls of various big gambling resorts (there's an especially big section dedicated to Saratoga, New York).
The funniest bit for me was the chapter on how horse racing is far and away the most popular type of gambling in the U.S., because it really, really isn't anymore. When this book was being written, states were just starting to implement lotteries and Atlantic City was just beginning to be revived as a gambling destination. How things have changed!
Anyway, the books is nearly as good a primary historical resource about gambling as it is a secondary one, but I'm OK with that. I'm not sure I'd really recommend it to someone who only wants to read one book about gambling in the U.S. though; there's got to be something more current out there.
bloodygranuaile: (oh noes)
The latest from the Books By Cool People I Met At Readercon files: I just finished reading The Lies of Locke Lamora, by Scott Lynch, the first book in the Gentlemen Bastards series, the third book of which releases in October. I have plans to attend a book signing for it in Cambridge with my writing group, so I figured it was imperative I read this series in a timely manner.

The author, Scott Lynch, was a thoroughly entertaining and informative speaker; I saw him on a panel called “The Xanatos Gambit,” which was about schemes and conspiracies and such. He is dating the infamously hilarious Elizabeth Bear, whose books I will also be reading as soon as they arrive. *eyes mailbox impatiently* He also has very nice hair.

The Lies of Locke Lamora takes place in a semi-Renaissance-y city called Camorr, which seems to be largely based on Venice, but with more sharks. Which is extra awesome and scary since Venice, and thereby Camorr, mostly has canals instead of roads. So there are SHARKS EVERYWHERE. Shark-fighting is, in fact, one of Camorr’s premier entertainments; by Camorran custom, only women can fight sharks.

Camorr is ruled by a Duke named Duke Nicovante, who nobody really cares about, and Camorr’s gangs are all ruled by a guy named Capa Barsavi, who consolidated all the gangs and developed a “Secret Peace” with the legitimate establishment that basically means that the gangs can steal and murder and stuff as long as they don’t steal from (a) policemen or (b) nobles. If you think this is a really fucked up and classist Secret Peace, you are right! And you will probably like our heroes, who pretend to hold with the Secret Peace but really don’t.

Now, this is not particularly an Issues Book, and the Gentlemen Bastards only do half the Robin Hood thing. They steal from the rich… because the rich have the most money, so they are the ones that you can steal the most money from! They don’t really give to the poor, though; mostly they just chuck all the money in a vault and take from it if they need to buy equipment for a scam. It’s actually kind of adorable.

The Gentlemen Bastards consists of:
LOCKE LAMORA: Locke Lamora has been a genius thief since he was first found by the Thiefmaker of Camorr (a Fagin-esque character who picks up orphans and trains the in pickpocketing so he can sell them to gangs later). The Thiefmaker sold him to a con man in record time because it was near impossible to stop baby Locke from trying out schemes that were clever, but way beyond the Thiefmaker’s pay grade in terms of fallout that Locke, being five, had not thought about. As an adult, Locke is a shortish, unassuming-looking dude, skinny, neither attractive nor unattractive; a master of disguise, who pretends to be a regular cat burglar in Capa Barsavi’s employ, but is actually a master swindler who has bilked enough of Camorr’s nobles out of enough thousands of crowns that he’s known as the Thorn of Camorr.
JEAN TANNEN: Jean is a big, fat, ugly motherfucker who is the bruiser of the gang. He carries a pair of hatchets called the Wicked Sisters, although he can probably kill you with pretty much anything he gets his hands on, or just with his hands, in a pinch. From the highest-class background among the Bastards, he also likes reading poetry and classic romances. The main relationship in this book is Jean and Locke’s bromance, which is truly bromantic.
CALO AND GALDO SANZA: Identical twins, known for being handsome (if with somewhat large noses), spending a lot of time at brothels, finishing each other’s sentences, and being outrageously skilled card sharks. (Nobody in Camorr says “card sharks” though because there are too many sharks around already.)
BUG: The Bastards’ teenage apprentice.
SABETHA: The lone female Gentlemen Bastard, she is off somewhere on a mysterious Mission or something, so we do not meet her during this book. Locke is rather hopelessly in love with her. Apparently she is a redhead. Scott Lynch appears to have felt that going on too much about the Lone Female Bastard Who Is Also The Love Interest And Is Apparently A Feisty Redhead would be somewhat cliché, so for now the Gentlemen Bastards is functionally all gentlemen.

The main antagonist is a fellow called the Grey King, who is killing off a bunch of Capa Barsavi’s garristas, meaning the heads of his gangs. This worries Locke, since, while he is careful to not be very important, he is officially the head of one of Capa Barsavi’s gangs.

Once I figured out that this was a story where the hero was a dude, his core group o’ buddies were all dudes, and the villain was a dude, I was somewhat prepared to be disappointed at this story being a Wall o’ Dude and there being no ladies, except maybe one Token Awesome Lady Who Is Awesome Because She’s The Only Lady And Is Not Like the Other Ladies. This turns out to have been a radically incorrect assumption on my part. Other dude authors who wish to write about dude heroes and their dude friends, please take note: You can, in fact, write a story about a dude hero and his best dude friends without leaving out the women entirely or reducing them to one-dimensional caricatures! The Lies of Locke Lamora has a lot of female secondary and tertiary characters, many of whom are flat-out AWESOME and have quite a bit of agency, and the rest of whom at least help the book avoid the weird Tolkien thing where the General Populace just seems to be all men. So we have some lady shark-fighters, as previously mentioned; a slew of female priestesses, alchemists, prison guards (!), gang members, pickpockets, merchants, and general random people; a batty old noblewoman who is not nearly as batty as she seems because she is actually the Duke’s spymaster; a beautiful young doña who, while her involvement in the story begins because she and her husband are a mark for one of the Bastards’ schemes, is also a highly accomplished botanical alchemist (I kind of want to be best friends with Doña Sofia, actually; she grows oranges infused with liquor); and, possibly one of my favorite characters of all time, Nazca Barsavi.

People who know me will understand why Nazca Barsavi is everything I want in a character. She is the daughter of Capa Barsavi, and she’s actually heavily involved in running the family business, making her a high-ranking mafiosa in her own right and quite likely to become the next Capa of Camorr if they can find a way to make her meathead older brothers deal with it. She wears steel-toed boots, because steel-toed boots are awesome, and she also wears glasses (er, optics). I had not even realized what an extreme shortage of kickass ladies who WEAR GLASSES there is in pretty much all storytelling ever. More of this, please! She is also friends with Locke! Actual, straight-up, honest-to-goodness friends, where they talk about stuff and clearly care about each other and when Capa Barsavi decides that they should get married, they are both all like “No offense, but together we are clever enough to find a way out of this stupid plan, right?” and then they agree to PLOT and SCHEME and BE AWESOME until they figure out a way to NOT marry each other without pissing off the Capa. She is also super bossy in flashback to when she was seven, and it is adorable. Basically, she is THE GREATEST. I would read an entire series just about Nazca Barsavi.

So you can understand how amazingly upset I was when the Gray King FRIDGED HER.

I specifically say the Gray King fridged her because honestly, Scott Lynch/the story in general didn’t. Lynch seems to be a member of the George R. R. Martin School of Killing Off Characters Right When You Are Really Excited To See What They’re Going To Do Next, so she’s not particularly singled out here (unfortunately for the readers’ feels). She also isn’t tortured or mutilated graphically or sexually molested or anything gratuitous like that. Her death was not a cheap plot point to engender manpain in our hero because otherwise the plot was sagging. Rather, the Gray King killed her specifically to show her father, Capa Barsavi, (who is emphatically not our hero) that he could get to him, and to upset Barsavi out of hiding. The text shines a pretty bright and unsubtle spotlight on how totally fucked up that sort of thing is by having all the characters whose “side” we are more or less on explicitly state that THAT IS REALLY FUCKED UP, LIKE A LOT and also berate Capa Barsavi for getting all vengeful because DUDE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTED YOU TO DO ARE YOU STUPID OR SOMETHING. So honestly I cannot really fault it from a storytelling point of view as being anywhere near as lazy as the usual Hero’s Girlfriend Is Killed Horribly, Vengeful Rampage Ensues. BUT I CAN BE MAD THAT THERE WAS NO MORE AWESOMENESS WITH NAZCA AFTER THAT POINT. And I am. Maybe if more books had characters like Nazca I would be less stuck on this.

Anyway. So Scott Lynch has proven that you actually CAN write a nonsexist book even with dude main characters, and also that we need more kickass ladies with glasses. Take note, people.

On a less sociologically-oriented note, the scams, cons, chases, and general conniving fuckery in this book is SO MUCH FUN. There is crossing and double-crossing and fake double-crossing, multiple layers of false identities, a disguised Locke getting punched in the face while the puncher explains “And that’s from Locke Lamora,” cursing, fire, pretty costumes, and, of course, more sharks. There is also some really amazing-sounding food. Overall the book ends up being a weird but highly addicting mishmash of “all the fun fluff!” and “very serious feels-punching.” Lynch particularly seems to enjoy putting Locke through a lot of physical abuse, causing long periods of suffering, which is a nice change from the Cartoon Biology that affects so many fantasy books (and its even more widespread Hollywood cousin, Cartoon Physics, which seems to have utterly taken over every live-action movie with a budget of more than about ten dollars).

Overall, I am very excited to read the second book, and also for the release of the third book, and also the author signing for the third book so I can tell Mr. Lynch to his face that just because I’m buying his books does NOT mean I forgive him for killing off Nazca.
bloodygranuaile: (Default)
The third book in Holly Black's Curse Workers series, Black Heart, was released on Tuesday! And I have read it already! I feel so hip and not-months-behind-on-things.

Anyway, in this one, Cassel is sort-of working for the Feds, and hating himself, and his memory worker brother Barron is also working for the Feds, and being a smarmy asshole, because he's Barron. Cassel is still at Wallingford Prep, where his roommate Sam and his hippie friend Daneca are still angry at each other after breaking up at the end of the last book. Lila is also mad at Cassel after not being cursed to be embarrassingly in love with him anymore, and she is working for her father's Mafia ring. Everyone is miserable, especially Cassel, because that's how he rolls (also, because his life sucks).

The story opens with Cassel "practicing" his stakeout skillz by stalking Lila in his black Benz that the mob gave him in the last book because Holly Black thought Cassel needed a sexy car they are trying to entice him to join the Zacharov crime family. Cassel is aware that this is sad and pathetic, and just in case he isn't, Barron is telling him. From this point shit gets weird. Cassel ends up involved in a blackmail scheme involving the Dean and another student who is also a worker, a job with the Feds to take out Governor Patton (the rabidly anti-worker governor of New Jersey who became even more rabidly anti-worker after Cassel's mom worked him in the last book, because Cassel's mom is bad news) that Cassel is all conflicted about and which may or may not be a setup, and a lot of messy situations involving Lila and feelings and communication mishaps that make Jane Austen characters look straightforward and not at all broody. There is also a large helping of black leather and expensive cars and excessive coffee-drinking, for added gritty sexy urban-ness. (Please note that I am making fun, but I am emphatically NOT COMPLAINING.)

Speaking of sexy, I wish to give Holly Black a big Socially Responsible gold star for writing a sex scene where birth control is actually mentioned! This does not happen enough in books, in my opinion. Birth control: it allows you to avoid irritating pregnancy plotlines! And contrary to popular opinion, the sex scenes can still be sexy! (This is, of course, assuming that you are a good enough writer to write sex scenes that are sexy in the first place, which is apparently a rare skill.)

Also, there are witty one-liners, but not enough of them to be too precious.

...I still want to be Holly Black when I grow up, but I don't think I'm smart enough.
bloodygranuaile: (Default)
So, way back when in April, I read White Cat, the first book in Holly Black's Curse Workers series. In October, I bought the second book, Red Glove, at the Boston Book Festival and got it signed (*cue fangirly squeeing*). And this week, I actually got around to reading the damn thing!

It only takes so long because I am drowning in awesome books, not because there is anything less than totally great about this book that would justify me having put it off for so long.

In this one, Lila, who used to be a cat in the last book, is now not a cat, so Cassel can stop feeling guilty about thinking he'd killed her, and go back to his lifelong habit of having a mopey intimidated crush on her and feeling inferior. Except he can't! Because Cassel's mother, who, while not actually in any particular crime family, is a criminal of the "magically seduce old guys and take all their money" sort, decided to do Cassel what she probably honestly thinks is a big fat favor, and magicked Lila to be hopelessly in love with him. Cassel, being a con man and a sometimes assassin but not a rapist, is Not Okay with this and goes off to be angry and mopey and run his private school's illegal gambling operations and live off of coffee, as he does. But his plans to get distracted by screwed-up family bullshit and fail French and physics are further complicated when Lila enrolls at Wallingford until the curse wears off because being away from him was making her physically ill. So there's that going on.

This isn't even entirely the main plot, because the main plot involves Cassel being unwillingly recruited by some douchebaggy Feds to try and figure out who killed his brother Philip, and some other dudes,but it was actually Cassel who killed the other dudes, although he's not about to tell the Feds that. Cassel's mother and his older brother Barron, who may or may not eventually figure out that Cassel forged a whole bunch of his memories back in the first book, pop up now and again to throw whatever wrenches into Cassel's plans Holly Black can possibly think up. Also, there's some political stuff going on about mandatory testing for curse workers, which provides many additional excuses for Cassel to get arrested, beat up, thrown around, dirty, unfed for days at a time, and generally put through the wringer. Then he drinks a lot of coffee and cons some people, and hates on himself, and it is all very dark and broody and sexy, but in a much more action-packed way than you find in a lot of dark broody sexy teen novels.

It is kind of odd to read in that the book is first-person POV from Cassel, and Cassel (a) hates himself (b) is too busy with issues of life and death and mafias and getting beat up to think overmuch about his appearance other than "am I covered in blood today" and (c) apparently sleeps like once a week and lives off of coffee and vodka, but at the same time you get the feeling of the author behind the book being all like "CASSEL'S A HOTTIE, LOOKIT THAT HOTTIE CON PEOPLE, PUT HIM IN A LEATHER JACKET AND A SHINY BLACK BENZ RIGHT NOW". But it all works, I think.

The last one is supposedly going to be called Black Heart, although for April Fool's last year she announced that they would be changing it to Green Money, which I think could make a pretty hilarious companion piece.
bloodygranuaile: (Default)
"M" is for "mob movie," and also "murder mystery"!

Last night I watched Scarface (the Pacino version, not the 1932 one), which somehow I had never seen before. I guess there's not a whole lot new that can be said about a classic like that--everyone knows what it's about. My thoughts: A friend recently compared mafia stories to trashy romance novels, and that was really all I could think about while watching it--this movie especially is very much a hyper-macho version of a trashy romance novel. I don't know why it amuses me so much, but nothing makes me laugh like loudly overdressed guys waving guns around and having gruff, heavily accented conversations about their balls. And god damn, do they talk about their balls a lot in this one! Factor in that Al Pacino's version of a Cuban accent is ridiculously mumbly and sort of weirdly low in the mouth so it sounds like he's keeping marbles in his jowls, and "balls" is about the only thing he says that you can make out half the time. Thankfully, this does not hold for the line "You need people like me, so you can point your fingers and say 'THAT'S the bad guy!'", which is such a fabulous line that "Say hello to my little friend" was quite a letdown afterwards. Also: the Gina subplot was my favorite, except for the poor girl's hair, and I wish she'd gotten a few more shots in. The whole grand "main plot" climax of "a large number of dudes show up and shoot lots of very large guns very loudly and there is lots and lots of shooting and yelling!" really just didn't have the same sort of emotional pull as Gina's final confrontation, what with all the actual dialogue referring to stuff that had actually happened, and there being a personal relationship between the two of them, and even having each individual shot from her handgun being individually discernible. I think I would have liked it better if Gina had just been a better shot and managed to take him out herself, and then the DEA or whoever (I wasn't even sure who it was that stormed the house at the end) had showed up and been like "...Um. Well then." But perhaps that is just me.

This morning I read Vicki Stiefel's The Grief Shop, which I think is the third installation in her Tally Whyte series, of which I have not read the first two. Vicki Stiefel was my Advanced Fiction Writing teacher last year, and gave us all copies of this book because it's her best-reviewed. And it's very good--fast-paced, multi-plotted, and Tally is a very capable not-actually-a-detective (she's a homicide grief counselor). Apparently some reviewers have characterized her as "whiny," but I judge her to be about 0.12 Hamlets of whiny, and a character really needs to be at least 0.25 Hamlets before they can actually be classed as "whiny." Also, she and most of her remaining family and also a bunch of small children are either dead or having attempts on their lives made for most of the book, so she's allowed to be less than chipper, I figure. I really don't want to talk about the plot, since it is a mystery novel and I don't want to spoil it for anyone else, but I will say that there are Nazis, and it is not goofy or cliched, which is impressive. It's also an extremely New England-y book, like even more New England-y than Castle is New-York-y. I personally had a bit of a difficult time reading some of it because of the small voice in my head comparing/contrasting every damn word in the book with all of the things Vicki taught us in class, but this is just a hazard of reading stuff by your teachers, and should not affect the reading experience of anyone who was not fortunate enough to take her writing classes.

Profile

bloodygranuaile: (Default)
bloodygranuaile

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
456 78910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 07:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios